- Package
- paymenter/paymenter
- Fixed in
- 1.5.7
- Published
- Fri 18 Sep 2026, 18:58 LisbonUpdated Mon 26 Oct 2026, 00:27 Lisbon
- Installs on Packagist
- 29
In plain words
An authenticated customer with an active service eligible for downgrade can receive multiple credit refunds for a single downgrade if concurrent requests bypass the eligibility check. The extra credit can be spent on invoices or additional services, causing financial and resource loss to the operator.
Affected versions
| Package | Affected | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| paymenter/paymenter | <= 1.5.6 | 1.5.7 |
Am I affected?
Look for paymenter/paymenter in composer.lock. Versions up to and including 1.5.6 are affected; 1.5.7 is fixed. Check whether authenticated customers can downgrade active services through app/Livewire/Services/Upgrade.php::doUpgrade(). The advisory names no additional configuration or database requirement.
What to do
Check which version you have, then update to a fixed release for your branch (1.5.7):
composer show paymenter/paymenter | grep versions
composer update paymenter/paymenter
If your version constraint in composer.json keeps you below a fixed release, raise it first. Whether your configuration is affected, and the exact version ranges, are in the advisory itself.
The advisory's description
Summary
The service downgrade implementation in app/Livewire/Services/Upgrade.php::doUpgrade() executes a proration calculation and a subsequent user credit refund without any transactional safety or database locks. The only concurrency check relies on an unisolated database query checking for existing pending upgrades. Because there is no active database transaction or pessimistic row-level lock spanning this validation and the subsequent credit update, concurrent downgrade requests can bypass the guard simultaneously. This allows a user to trigger multiple refunds for a single service downgrade.
Technical Details
The issue occurs because the application verifies eligibility using an unlocked read operation (Service::upgradable) which checks if a pending upgrade row exists. Since there is no enclosing DB::transaction or lockForUpdate(), multiple requests sent in parallel can all query the database at the same millisecond, observe that no pending upgrade exists, and pass the safety check.
Once passed, each concurrent request inserts its own pending upgrade record and executes $credit->increment('amount', abs($price)). Because the balance updates are not serialized against the initial check, the user's credit balance is cumulatively inflated by $N$ times the refund amount for a single legitimate downgrade.
Impact
This race condition allows any authenticated customer with an active, downgradable service to inflate their spendable credit balance to an arbitrary multiple of their legitimate refund amount.
Because the newly granted balance acts as real, spendable store credit, it can be immediately leveraged to settle future platform invoices or provision additional services, resulting in direct financial and resource loss to the operator.
Weakness: CWE-362 Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition'). Reported by Pig-Tail, CorwinDev.
The advisory
- GitHub Advisory Database: GHSA-5gmm-hjfj-8ff7, with who is affected and how
- OSV.dev: GHSA-5gmm-hjfj-8ff7
- The week's digest, with the other advisories from 14 Sep 2026
- All advisories for paymenter/paymenter